Criminal Justice Administration and Human Services Department
Course Prefix and Number:
Expert and Scientific Evidence
Examination of the role and function of expert and scientific evidence in the legal system, and critical evaluation of the standards governing the integration of law and science. Topics include the Frye, Daubert and other standards governing scientific evidence; ethical issues concerning expert testimony; the interface between the scientific, legal and law enforcement communities; and particularized consideration of evidentiary issues connected with specific scientific techniques. Prerequisites: Junior standing.
Prerequisite(s) / Corequisite(s):
Course Rotation for Day Program:
Most current editions of the following:
Many suitable textbooks are available from various publishers and the following list is not comprehensive. Other textbooks may be judged by individual instructors to be more suitable in meeting course objectives. Many current textbooks have companion websites, and the instructor is encouraged to enhance the course experience for the student by utilizing available technology.
The instructor may also want to consider directing the student to websites containing Criminal Codes and Criminal Cases, such as http://www.findlaw.com or other legal sites maintained by governmental or not for profit entities.
Scientific Evidence in Civil and Criminal Cases
By Moenssens, Starrs, Henderson and Inbau (Foundation Press) Recommended
Science at the Bar: Law Science and Technology in America
By Jasonoff (Harvard Press) Recommended
Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts
By Foster and Huber (MIT Press) Recommended
Forensic Evidence: Science and the Criminal Law
By Kiely (CRC Press) Recommended
To understand and appreciate the history and evolution of scientific and expert evidence in the justice system.
To understand the distinctions between the scientific and expert evidence and other forms of evidence in court proceedings.
To gain experience with the common legal terminology, methods and procedures connected with scientific and expert testimony.
To focus on legal issues and techniques connected with scientific and expert evidence in the criminal justice system which are not extensively considered or analyzed in other courses.
To examine the practical and theoretical difficulties in merging scientific and legal principles.
To demonstrate critical thinking, research and writing skills on issues relevant to scientific and expert evidence.
Describe the history of the use of scientific evidence in court proceedings.
Define and differentiate between the Frye and Daubert standards for admission of scientific and expert evidence.
Explain the role of expert testimony in modern trials.
Identify and evaluate the ethical issues surrounding the use of expert testimony.
Describe the common methods and procedures utilized in contacts and dealings between the scientific community and the legal community.
Identify and analyze the current evidentiary issues with specific scientific procedures and techniques and apply the Frye and Daubert standards to current and emerging procedures and techniques.
NOTE: The intention of this master course syllabus is to provide an outline of the contents of this course, as specified by
the faculty of Columbia College, regardless of who teaches the course, when it is taught, or where it is taught. Faculty members teaching this
course for Columbia College are expected to facilitate learning pursuant to the course objectives and cover the subjects listed in the topical
outline. However, instructors are also encouraged to cover additional topics of interest so long as those topics are relevant to the course's
subject. The master syllabus is, therefore, prescriptive in nature but also allows for a diversity of individual approaches to course material.